- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:49:57 +0000
- To: Jakub Dabrowski <jakubdab@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
Jakub Dabrowski wrote: > 1. Document Header. > Author of the document must explicitly allow translclusion of his > work. Why? Isn't this what intellectual property law is for? > 3. Transclusion > Possible for whole (allowed by author) document with <object> tag or > for its parts also with object tag with some parameters. > "type" stands for the way contnt should be rendered: text, xhtml, > html, etc... But what specifications should be followed to transform content between wildly different media types? > 3.1 Proposal 1 > <!-- remote document.html --> > <p id="myid1">some text</p> > > <!-- document with translusion--> > <object src="www.remoteserver.com/document.html" > srctype="application/html+xml" type="plain" transid="myid1"> > <em>cannot get content from remote server</em> > </object> I assume you meant "application/xhtml+xml" and "text/plain"? What about replacing transid with: src="http://www.remoteserver.com/document.html#myid1"? > But one <object> cannot transclude another for deadlock prevention. So what should happen when some <object/> /does/ transclude content containing another <object/>? Should the entire transclusion be cancelled? -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:51:35 UTC