- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:35:49 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- cc: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, www-html@w3.org
On 30 Apr, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> All browsers have bugs, but we need to determine the most reasonable
> behaviour based on the way existing browsers work.
and
> Yes it is a direct result of undefined error handling. Authors build
> pages that rely on bugs in whatever browser they use, so in the eyes
> of the author, the buggy browser behaviour is correct. That has
> been
While admitting that, will you still stand by the philosophy that the
most reasonable behaviour should be based on *what existing browsers
do*?
> Those specs contain unimplemented features because they cannot be
> implemented. Some things are left undefined, others are defined in
Can you enumerate the features that /cannot/ be implemented?
--
- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies
tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net
+46 708 557 905
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 13:36:02 UTC