- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:43:46 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Apr 21, 2007, at 16:52, David Woolley wrote: > > I see no mention of "src" in the parsing section. Perhaps you are > confusing the conformance requirements on the DOM shapes with the I'm referring to: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-scripting0.html#script1 >> I think that either the script start tules need to change to special >> case <script src=...., > > The spec needs to reflect what browsers already do here. The claim on the lynx-dev list was that a real problem was being caused because, unamed popular browsers were treating <script src=.... /> as empty, whereas Lynx was eating the following code in CDATA mode. Their analysis was that <tag /> means <tag></tag> in modern HTML, but that is not born out by the HTML5 lexical rules, and would be an undesirable of XHTML behaviour into HTML. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lynx-dev/2007-04/msg00019.html > P.S. Please consider sending feedback about HTML5 to the WHATWG list: > http://www.whatwg.org/mailing-list#specs I'll consider it, but I'm already tracking more of these lists that I can do justice to.
Received on Sunday, 22 April 2007 13:43:59 UTC