On Apr 3, 2007, at 09:28, David Woolley wrote: > XHTML processors are allowed to fix up invalid documents. DTDless XHTML documents are not valid as far as XML 1.0 terminology goes, but it doesn't follow that a DTDless document needs fixing. > Basically, if well-formed-ness is the author's concern, they should > simply validate against an HTML DTD with all the O for optionals in > the the DTD changed into "-"s. Not so easy: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fhsivonen.iki.fi%2Ftest% 2Fno-space-between-attributes.xhtml If you want to check for well-formedness, you need an XML processor as defined in the XML 1.0 spec. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2007 12:16:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 30 April 2020 16:21:02 UTC