- From: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
- To: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
--- David Latapie <david@empyree.org> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > This is a very great message I'm happy to comment on. > > Le 23 sept. 06 à 16:55, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis a écrit : > > > What's more, I would very much appreciate a list of web content where > > XHTML 2.0 would *not* be suitable markup. > > I second you on this one. > > > Too many components seem to be doing the same thing: > > I agree with you on points #1 and #2. > > As for point #3, I'm thinking about something akin to a generic <em> > with a "property="numerical value"" denoting particular importance. > <em role="0"> default > <em role="+1"> equivalent to em > <em role="+2"> equivalent to strong > <em role="-1"> less important, may be rendered a font-size:smaller, > for instance. This is my personal use of the <small> tag, for a one- > liner. I had suggested something similar to this back in June. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2006Jun/0034.html > > as for "role", the term may not be correct (I'm not much familiar > with XHTML 2 yet), but I hope you get the point. > > As for point #4, that I only partially understood, wasn't there > supposed to be only <object> for embedding everything? What is the > rationale for going back to the lesser solution of several embedding > tags? > > > specifically for software documentation (which seems to be the use-case > > for <samp> and friends)? > > I use samp for my examples, even out of documentation: “When > something bad happens to me (<samp>missing the bus, missing an > opportunity…</samp>)”. I see no reason <samp></samp> should be > limited to documentation (although I recognize it is its most > frequent use). > The same goes with <code>code</code>, that I also use when writing > about linguistics; after all, this is code too! > > To enjoy/like/love (French) > > J'aime > Tu aime<code>s</code> > Il aime > Nous aim<code>ons</code> > Vous aime<code>z</code> > Ils aime<code>nt</code> > > > > Don't let XHTML 2.0 becomes the new HTML 3.0 ! > -- > </david_latapie> > http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00 > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 10:35:31 UTC