- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:21:46 +0200
- To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:44:31 +0200, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net> wrote: > I'm worried that you are worried! :) That's a relief then! > However, that was only one of Cecil's points. The other was the use of > @title on <link>, and my point is simply that, although our rules > indicate that this is possible: > > <link rel="meta" href="OurICRAPolicy.rdf"> > <meta property="title">ICRA</meta> > </link> > > there has been some discussion over on RDFa about changing the meaning > of this. Ah, I see. In other words, for the case of <link>. So you still agree that this is OK: <p> <meta property="title">Not pain but <em xml:lang="fr">pain</em></meta> > I'm therefore saying that Cecil's post is a very useful > reminder of why we need to ensure that the mark-up I've just used > yields the correct triples to support his use-case. Agreed. It would be unfortunate if it worked for some elements, and not others. Fears allayed. Thanks! Steven
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 11:22:00 UTC