- From: Livio Mondini <livio.mondini@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:33:50 +0100
- To: "Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis" <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Cc: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, www-html@w3.org
2006/11/22, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>: > I should think XHTML is more expensive to develop for than HTML because > it is less backwards compatible, so supporting both old-fashioned and > modern user agents takes up more developer time. More developer time? ok, ok > Microsoft's stated reasons for driving web designers up the wall can be > found at: > > http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/09/15/467901.aspx Yes, i know. But "I made the decision to not try to support the MIME type in IE7 simply because I personally want XHTML to be successful in the long run" XHTML1, i think. A little numbering question. XHTML1 for secula seculorum? great! i want html 3.2 for the good of web. Livio
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2006 08:34:00 UTC