- From: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:25:20 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The whole HTML Text Module is rather contrived, considering it's the only Module still in existence which contains most of the holdover definitions from HTML 3.2, a lot of which probably aren't necessary. Is it necessary to have <var>, <samp>, <kbd>, etc? Most of them are never used simply because their use cases aren't common in regular writing. OTOH, structures that ARE commonly used have been rejected as not being necessary because of the existence of role. Maybe someone should look into condensing the Text Module as well? Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: >> It's a holdover from HTML 3.2. It isn't even legacy markup, since it has >> been used very little; it exists in theory only. > > According to my studies it's used in around 0.1% of the Web's pages. One > in every thousand pages isn't bad, given how few pages could be expected > to be defining terms; In particular, it's used more than <ins>, <del>, > <var>, <samp>, <bdo>, etc. > > Then again, it's used less than <blink>, <bgsound>, <marquee>, <spacer>. > So maybe that doesn't mean so much. > - -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox! http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox! Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEJNQ4wWrjHBui99cRArwvAJ47ncQIjBDSRoPWuvzgZBpj3JgGxQCePEKZ n4QV9lgINeam2xO3DQGOa5k= =s2/K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 25 March 2006 00:54:06 UTC