- From: Alpt <alpt@freaknet.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 06:22:20 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 05:05:10AM -0500, <dolphinling>: ~> What happens if one of the servers sends different content than the others? That's a problem of the website developer. He has to be sure that the mirror is really a mirror. A first check would be to verify that the size of the three different downloads is the same. On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:39:14AM +0100, <Laurens Holst>: ~> How about first of all making it valid XML? ~> ~> <a href="http://www.python.org/ http://www.python.mirror1.org ~> http://www.python.mirror2.org/">Python Powered</a> ~> ~> Would be a good start. But then, that would conflict with people having ~> spaces in their URLs, which is done quite frequently. What about: <a href="http://url1||http://url2||http://url3">...</a> or something like that. On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:26:05AM -0000, <Dave Woolley>: ~> URIs are standardised by IETF, not W3C (you basically have a three ~> part URL, not three separate URLs). ok. ~> Also, the above violates the SGML and XML core syntax so is never ~> going to be possible. Ok, let's find a good solution then. ~> Generally, servers have more bandwidth than clients, and this is ~> only of benefit for uncached resources where the servers are the choke ~> points. This is not always true, for example if the client uses multi inet-gw it will have a great advantage. The multigw is described here: http://idiki.dyne.org/wiki/Multisuperfetcha ~> There is a problem in synchronising the parts. This is true if we are talking about a html page, but what about: <a href="http://url1/distro.iso", "http://url2/distro.iso", "http://url3/distro.iso"">...</a> If they are mirrors, they are already synchronized. Best regards. -- :wq! "I don't know nothing" The One Who reached the Thinking Matter '.' [ Alpt --- Freaknet Medialab ] [ GPG Key ID 441CF0EE ] [ Key fingerprint = 8B02 26E8 831A 7BB9 81A9 5277 BFF8 037E 441C F0EE ]
Received on Saturday, 11 March 2006 05:23:00 UTC