- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@tigerstaden.no>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:15:03 +0100
- To: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, "Daniel Schierbeck" <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:27:25 +0100, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > How would it be different from the target attribute as it now works? <http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/present/frames.html#adef-target> # This attribute specifies the name of a frame where a document is to be opened. # # By assigning a name to a frame via the name attribute, authors can refer to it as the # "target" of links defined by other elements. The target attribute may be set for # elements that create links (A, LINK), image maps (AREA), and forms (FORM). Notice which section of the HTML specification 'target' is described in. That's right -- the Frames section. XHTML 1.1 doesn't have Frames. Neither will XHTML 2.0. @target is deprecated and doesn't exist in neither HTML 4.01 Strict nor XHTML 1.0 Strict. Its use is prescribed and is behavioural. 'rel' values like 'alternate' and 'related' would make more advisory and semantic and would fit into everything from HTML 4.01 to XHTML 2.0 to HTML5. -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 09:14:56 UTC