W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Identifying end tags

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 09:49:35 +0100
Message-ID: <449CFC9F.4020702@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Nickolas Nansen <nick_nansen@hotmail.com>
CC: www-html@w3.org

I agree with most of Nickolas's points, although

 > It's not always easy to keep track of how many div's to end at the
> end of the local code

seems odd to one who always ends his tags as soon as
he starts them (that is, I write <div></div> and then
re-position the cursor rather than writing <div> and
then relying on memory).  I also find

 > Besides indenting rarely works so well it should be used
> as an indicator of relations.

rather odd : if only Dreamweaver would leave my indentation
alone (/particularly/ when using Library elements and
templates), I would find indentation normally sufficient,
except where the open and close tags are so far apart
vertically that their alignment cannot be visually

However, I do strongly support the suggestion of
allowing attributes on end tags :

> With attributes
> <div id="design">
> <div id="content">
> <div id="maincontent">
> <div id="related">
>             Content
> </div id="related">
> </div id="maincontent">
> </div id="content">
> </div id="design">

and although I hear (and have heard many times before) the
counter-argument (HTML is XHTML is XML, and XML doesn't
allow attributes there), I do continue to wonder if carrying
all the baggage of XML is really worth the effort : are there
as yet /any/ browsers that use a real XML parser to handle
XHTML, any more than there are browsers that use a real SGML
parser to handle HTML ?  I often feel that we are in grave
danger of throwing out the baby with the bathwater by blindly
adopting as our masters standards that in reality have little
if any influence on what really happens in the browser ...

Philip Taylor
Received on Saturday, 24 June 2006 08:48:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 30 April 2020 16:20:59 UTC