- From: Christoph Schneegans <Christoph@Schneegans.de>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:22:29 GMT
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Alexandre Alapetite wrote: > I suggest a new correction to this problem, in the "module of common > content models for XHTML 1.1" > [http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/SCHEMA/xhtml11-model-1.xsd], > adding a reference to a group defined in the events module > [http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/SCHEMA/xhtml-events-1.xsd]. That sounds promising. I've updated <http://schneegans.de/sv/> with your modification, and it seems to work. Thanks for your effort; I tried to modify the schemas myself for ten minutes or so, but got completely lost. > Here is an XHTML Basic example > [http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/schemas/xhtml-basic-sample.xml] > that is not working with the current XHTML Basic XML Schema > [http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/SCHEMA/xhtml-basic10.xsd] > (2006-02-13). Yes, <http://schneegans.de/sv/?url=http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/schemas/xhtml-basic-sample.xml> gives a strange error message. The problem is obviously located in <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PR-xhtml-modularization-20060213/SCHEMA/xhtml-basic10-model-1.xsd>: <xs:group name="xhtml.HeadOpts.mix"> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="meta" type="xhtml.meta.type"/> <xs:element name="link" type="xhtml.link.type"/> <xs:element name="object" type="xhtml.object.type"/> </xs:choice> </xs:group> <xs:group name="xhtml.head.content"> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="title" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" type="xhtml.title.type" /> <xs:element name="base" type="xhtml.base.type" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" /> <xs:group ref="xhtml.HeadOpts.mix" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> </xs:choice> </xs:group> This looks flawed, since it allows <head> <base href="" /> </head> or <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en" /> </head>, but prohibits <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en" /> <base href="" /> </head>. > Since XHTML Modularisation is still a "Proposed Recommendation", Given the definition in <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#RecsPR>, I doubt that "still" is the proper word here. -- <http://schneegans.de/> |
Received on Monday, 5 June 2006 17:23:48 UTC