- From: आशीष शुक्ला \ <wahjava@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 22:02:56 +0530
- To: www-html@w3.org
Hi, On 6/3/06, Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> wrote: > The practical problem here is, what signals the change of the encoding? > Is it the end of the meta element, or the end of the content attribute > of the meta start tag? Since no such thing is specified, we can safely > assume that the character encoding cannot change during the document. Yup, it is the end of the <meta> tag, because the parser will accept <meta> tag only when that tag is properly parsed. This is what I think should happen > Sebastian Redl > And what about EBCDIC (or other non-ASCII compatible encoding) based XML documents which contains following prolog: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="encoding-name"?> I've never seen non-ASCII based XML documents. So I think, the document has to be split in two parts, first which is encoded in ASCII compatible encoding, should become header and the rest of the document which contains the text (encoded in encoding specified in the header part). Am I correct or not ?? And what about this issue of HTML priority, is that priority order wrong ? Thanks Ashish Shukla -- Ashish Shukla "Wah Java !!" आशीष शुक्ल> ,= ,-_-. =. ((_/)o o(\_)) `-'(. .)`-' \_/ My blah, blah, blah at http://wahjava.blogspot.com/ My webpages at http://www.geocities.com/wah_java_dotnet/ My GPG Fingerprint: BBA9 AD7D BA71 61EB BE46 8CF5 E44A C663 A03F 4261 My GPG keys at http://keyserv.nic-se.se:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA03F4261 -- Supercomputers are for people too rich and too stupid to design efficient algorithms -- Steven Skiena, Department of Computer Science, SUNY Stony Brook.
Received on Saturday, 3 June 2006 16:33:06 UTC