- From: <mr.hartung.acc10@streber24.de>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:18:22 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I have thought about the XHTML 2.0 invention of derrived hyrarchie by <section> and <h>. Up to now the layout is considered as followed: <h>heading of section_1</h> <section> this is section_1 <h>heading of section_1.1</h> <section>this is section_1.1</section> </section> My problem is, that there is no way of identifying header and section in XML ways easily as the structure is follow-up instead of nested-in. So I would like to ask why it isn't designed somehow like the following way: <section> <shead>heading of section_1</shead> <sbody>this is section_1</sbody> <section> <shead>heading of section_1.1</shead> <sbody>this is section_1.1</sbody> </section> </section> --- or alternatively ---- <section> <shead>heading of section_1</shead> <sbody> this is section_1 <section> <shead>heading of section_1.1</shead> <sbody>this is section_1.1</sbody> </section> </sbody> </section> Up to now I consider such a layout as much more easily dealable with, e.g. for copying processes with the aim of not loosing the correspondance of heading and section text. I would appreciate answer of the developers or those who understand the benefits of their layout to those suggested by me. In case my suggestion would be considered as preferable: Who could I address it to? Will it automatically be forwarded from this discussion group to the XHTML 2.0 developers? And finally: How long will it still take to bring XHTML to REC status? I suffer to use it. Thanks a lot in advance for your answers. Mr. BS Hartung, Germany, Dresden
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2006 12:26:17 UTC