- From: Frank Hellenkamp <jonas.info@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:21:18 +0200
- To: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 20:21:39 UTC
>>> in HTML _and_ XHTML you can change the DOM by adding content via DOM >>> methods. And you may need a noscript alternative then. So the need >>> for noscript is not a difference between HTML and XHTML. >> >> No. With the DOM method, the whole document is the noscript content. >> You don't need an element to identify it, you can modify it at will. > > I think, whether you need an alternative (noscript) for the scripting > depends on what is done in the script. If essential functionality is > added via scripting, a noscript alternative _is_ needed. ? why? in your html is the content *without* javascript with all essential functionality. if javascript is active, you can hide, change or whatever this with your script. so? frank -- frank hellenkamp | interface designer jonas.info@gmx.net | mail +49.30.49 78 20 70 | tel +49.173.70 55 781 | mbl +49.12120.243 912 | fax
Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 20:21:39 UTC