- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:20:46 -0500
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: >> use. For instance if many new elements are added that >> describe human emotions then they can all be moved to >> a new "emotion" module. At least this is the >> impression I got from XHTML Modularization.u >> > > That sounds to me like an attempt to replace XML with > XHTML. The current policy is, I believe, that XHTML > provides a small set of easy to learn features that allow > relatively unskilled people to write useful documents, but, > by using XML namespaces, it can be extended in domain > specific ways. > That's correct. You can create whatever modules you want in your domain, and connect them to your markup language using Modularization techniques. Of course, you then need to persuade a user agent to do something with them. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 7 July 2006 15:21:03 UTC