Re: Question about XHTML 2.0 and content type

On Feb 2, 2006, at 23:11, David Dorward wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 22:08 +0100, Christian Hujer wrote:
>
>> I'm glad that Mozilla negotiates to accept application/xhtml+xml  
>> with higher
>> priority than text/html, and I would like to see a tradition of  
>> proper
>> content negotiation being established.
>
> A fudge to get XHTML+MathML documents.

Indeed.

For those interested in how Mozilla's Accept header took its form, I  
suggest the following:
http://groups.google.com/group/netscape.public.mozilla.mathml/ 
browse_thread/thread/f0d7442075946397/
http://groups.google.com/group/netscape.public.mozilla.mathml/ 
browse_thread/thread/ab83de837ff21576/
http://groups.google.com/group/netscape.public.mozilla.mathml/ 
browse_thread/thread/a2dd34dc398590f2/
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58040

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 22:35:25 UTC