Re: how is this Strict valid?

Tina Holmboe wrote:

>   "Note that in XHTML 1.0, the name attribute of these elements is
>    formally deprecated, and will be removed in a subsequent version
>    of XHTML." - quote the XHTML 1.0 spec.
> 
>   I wouldn't call it "perfectly ok".

Then we'll agree to disagree here. If there's a valid reason for using 
it, even if it's deprecated but still present, I'd call that perfectly 
ok (as long as the developer is aware of it).

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________

Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 15:14:30 UTC