- From: Paul Nelson (ATC) <paulnel@winse.microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:50:16 -0800
- To: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, <www-html@w3.org>
The Unicode Bidirectional algorithm(http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/) provides the guidance on how to process this. The correct layout is [1]. Because the Hebrew is a RTL script, the addition of the span does nothing to change the layout. One could just as easily have put: <p>English1 עברית2. עברית3 Englisch4.</p> If you wanted the layout of [2], you can do the following to force the right bidirectional embedding: <p>English1 עברית2. <span dir=ltr>עברית3 Englisch4.</span></p> Some years ago I wrote a document "Authoring HTML for Middle Eastern Content". It can be found at: http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/handson/dev/Mideast.mspx Paul -----Original Message----- From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mikko Rantalainen Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:43 PM To: www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: > 8.2.3 Setting the direction of embedded text > http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/dirlang.html#h-8.2.3 > > describes the use of the 'dir'-attribute on inline elements, and gives a > nice (and simple) example. > > Let me give another example: > > <p>English1 <span dir="rtl">עברית2</span>. > <span dir="rtl">עברית3</span> Englisch4.</p> > > In plain text > English1 Hebrew2. Hebrew3 English4. > > Which some browsers (Mozilla familiy, IE) display > > [1] English1 3werbeH .2werbeH English4. > > and Konqueror 3.5.5 displays > > [2] English1 2werbeH. 3werbeH English4. > > Which one is compliant to the W3C Specification? I believe that the [1] variant is the correct one. As the span elements above are not nested with each other I think the correct rendering should be similar to rendering of <p>English1 <span dir="rtl">עברית2. עברית3</span> English4.</p> or <p>English1 עברית2. עברית3 English4.</p> which, if I've understood correctly, should be rendered like the [1] variant above. (I interpret the above to contain two RTL text runs separated by neutral characters.) -- Mikko
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 21:50:03 UTC