www-html@w3.org from December 2006 by date

Tuesday, 26 December 2006

• Re: this needs to be changed in the validator Karl Dubost
• Re: how is this Strict valid? Karl Dubost

Friday, 22 December 2006

• Re: how is this Strict valid? Frank Ellermann
• Re: how is this Strict valid? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: how is this Strict valid? Tina Holmboe
• Re: this needs to be changed in the validator David Dorward
• this needs to be changed in the validator Jasper Magick
• Re: how is this Strict valid? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: how is this Strict valid? Tina Holmboe
• how is this Strict valid? Jasper Magick

Wednesday, 20 December 2006

• RE: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Paul Nelson (ATC)
• Re: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Helmut Wollmersdorfer
• Re: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Orion Adrian
• Re: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Helmut Wollmersdorfer
• RE: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Paul Nelson (ATC)
• RE: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Jukka K. Korpela

Tuesday, 19 December 2006

• RE: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Paul Nelson (ATC)
• Re: 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Mikko Rantalainen

Monday, 18 December 2006

• 'dir' attribute on BIDI inline elements and actual browsers Helmut Wollmersdorfer

Friday, 15 December 2006

• Re: Location of Relax NG files for XHTML 2? Laurens Holst

Friday, 8 December 2006

• Location of Relax NG files for XHTML 2? Peter Krantz

Wednesday, 6 December 2006

• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html Philip TAYLOR
• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html David Woolley
• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html L. David Baron
• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html Karl Dubost
• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html L. David Baron
• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html olivier Thereaux

Tuesday, 5 December 2006

• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html XStandard
• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html Karl Dubost
• Re: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html Ian Hickson
• RE: XHTML 1.0 served as text/html Simon Pieters
• XHTML 1.0 served as text/html Philip TAYLOR

Friday, 1 December 2006

• Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14 James Pickering
• Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14 Karl Dubost
• Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14 James Pickering

Last message date: Tuesday, 26 December 2006 01:00:54 UTC