- From: Alastair Campbell <ac@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:47:17 -0000
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Hi, I'd just like to add my support to John Foliot's request about access keys: http://www.wats.ca/articles/xhtmlroleaccessmodulestillflawed/80 I work for a company that regularly usability tests sites with people who have disabilities, covering a wide range of sites, technologies and skills. We have never come across a positive example of accesskeys[*], and I wrote about this myself some time ago: http://www.nomensa.com/resources/articles/access-keys.html Just to add one further point, the only useful implementation of access keys I have come across is on the accessify site: http://accessify.com/preferences/accesskeys/ This gives control to the user over what keys are used - something that can and should be covered by future standards in the way John describes. I consider myself and my company to be advocates of the W3C (and we will continue to be regardless of this issue), so please don't take this as criticism, just a nudge in the right direction. Kind regards, -Alastair * I've heard of (but not tested) accesskey implementations on intranet based web applications, and for people who use an application a lot there are obvious advantages where learning can overcome ease of use. However, these would still be catered for under the proposed changes. -- Alastair Campbell | Director of Research & Development Please refer to the following disclaimer for this message: http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer.html
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 14:14:37 UTC