- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:39:32 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
> > Semantics of <dl> > > > > A definition list defines the relationship between text that the user > > can identify (dictionary terms, faq questions, a key) and the text the > > user desires (dictionary definitions, faq answers, a value). > > What would "the relationship" be? And why is the element named <dl> and > not <relations> or something like that? What would the subelements be? > I never said we shouldn't rename it. I defined what the relationship is. One is text the user/machine browses through for the purpose of selection and the other is the text the user/machine is interested in. The <dt> is text that can be easily parsed and identified. <dd> cannot be. > How would the meaning differ from markup where the "text that the user can > identify" is marked up as a heading? > <h> is a special case, but it implies the same kind of relationship. So is <caption> for <table>, so is <label> for <nl>, but in this case it's a list of these kinds of relationships and not a single item. > Would the specification say that such markup is suitable for dialogs, too? > It might, but I'm not asserting that in this case. If the group decides to go that route I would be ok with it. In that case it's a repeating label useful for selecting the lines spoken by a particular person or group. However it differs slightly from the others in that it's a multiset and not a set relationship and is a bit fuzzier in usage. Orion Adrian Orion Adrian
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:39:37 UTC