- From: Tonico Strasser <contact_tonico@yahoo.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:36:38 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
Jukka K. Korpela schrieb: > On Thu, 26 May 2005, Laurens Holst wrote: > > >>>(dt, dd)+ >> >>I think (hope) this is intentional. This is also the case in HTML 4. > > > I think (fear) that the muddy semantics is intentional too; in HTML 4 it > may still have been an accident. Call it a duck, name it duck, and then > tell it can be used as a cow. So much for semantics. That is, it is > called a definition list, explained as a definition list, and the tag > names reflect this, and then we have the final statement, which tells that > it was all a joke and we just have some tags that can be used whenever you > wish to achieve some particular layout: > > "Another application of dl, for example, is for marking up dialogues, with > each dt naming a speaker, and each dd containing his or her words." > > Another application of a duck is for milking... *LOL*, very true. Will this be fixed in XHTML2? http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-list.html#edef_list_dl Tonico
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 10:40:08 UTC