- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 12:15:53 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
Even so, I'd like to avoid any grouping structures that add additional depth that would interfere with xpath and CSS selectors. Can you show how to simply get around this issue in XML compliant way? Orion Adrian On 5/23/05, Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl> wrote: > Orion Adrian wrote: > > However <seperator /> is very lightweight while <group> or similar is > > not. It also doesn't require CSS styling by the author to be useful. > > There is a web out there that doesn't use CSS at all and it would > > behoove us to assume it's existence. It also imposes yet another layer > > of depth which will interfere with child (as opposed to decendant) > > type selectors in both CSS and XPath. > > I never said CSS was required. The "grouping construct" should of course > be defined in a similar way to "separator" (spelling issues...). > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > >
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 16:16:04 UTC