Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0

Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
> But a separator in this form is semantically vague, because you have
> to guess what it actually separates. I know from experience when
> building scrapers to generate rss form html. It's very easy if each
> item is in its own container, than when they are only separated by a
> separator. In particular it's hard to see where the first item
> starts, and where the last item ends.

+1. Especially to the 'vague' argument. If there is needed something 
different from SECTION that separates it should be a container element 
as well. Not "another" empty element.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 07:58:50 UTC