Tuesday, 31 May 2005
- Re: Availability of XHTML 2.0 7th WD RNG schema
- role should be a list of QNames
- Re: Availability of XHTML 2.0 7th WD RNG schema
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading" (PR#7751)
- Re: [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading" (PR#7751)
- Re: [XHTML 2] Embedding Attributes Examples
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: [XHTML 2] Embedding Attributes Examples
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading" (PR#7751)
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: Availability of XHTML 2.0 7th WD RNG schema
- Re: Difference between role and property
- Re: Availability of XHTML 2.0 7th WD RNG schema
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: XHTML 2 issue tracking system?
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
- Re: XHTML 2 issue tracking system?
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
- What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
Monday, 30 May 2005
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Re: XHTML 2 issue tracking system?
- Re: XHTML 2 issue tracking system?
Sunday, 29 May 2005
- Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 document conformance requirements
- Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 document conformance requirements
- Comments on XHTML 2.0 document conformance requirements
- Re: Namespaces for the values of @property attribute
- Re: [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation"
- Namespaces for the values of @property attribute
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: separator abuse
- The relationship to RDF
- separator abuse
- Re: Availability of XHTML 2.0 7th WD RNG schema
- Re: [XHTML 2] Embedding Attributes Examples
- Re: [XHTML 2] Embedded Resources containing links
Saturday, 28 May 2005
- [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation"
- [XHTML2] Scope of XHTML2
- Difference between role and property
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: section heading
- XHTML 2 issue tracking system?
- Re: Availability of XHTML 2.0 7th WD RNG schema
- Availability of XHTML 2.0 7th WD RNG schema
- Re: About the new 2.0 tags
- Re: About the new 2.0 tags
- Re: About the new 2.0 tags
- Re: About the new 2.0 tags
- Re: section heading
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
Friday, 27 May 2005
Saturday, 28 May 2005
- section heading
- New XHTML 2.0 WD - 2005-05-27
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Formal Response to My issue on styling embedding attributes. (PR#7655)
Friday, 27 May 2005
- Re: Formal Response to My issue on styling embedding attributes. (PR#7655)
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
Thursday, 26 May 2005
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
- XHTML 2.0 lecture at XTech
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
- Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: XHTML2 <style> questions
- RE: XHTML2 <style> questions
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: XHTML2 <style> questions
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
Wednesday, 25 May 2005
- XHTML 2 Issue handling
- Re: XHTML2 <style> questions
- RE: XHTML2 <style> questions
- Re: XHTML2 <style> questions
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- XHTML2 <style> questions
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: Restructuring the Ordered List
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: infix separators (vs. exfix wrappers) [was: Re: About XHTML 2.0]
Tuesday, 24 May 2005
- RE: CSS Positioning
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: When XHTML 2.0 will be published?
- Re: CSS Positioning
- CSS Positioning
- RE: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: When XHTML 2.0 will be published?
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
Monday, 23 May 2005
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator
- Re: separator/seperator
- RE: About XHTML 2.0
- infix separators (vs. exfix wrappers) [was: Re: About XHTML 2.0]
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: When XHTML 2.0 will be published?
- Re: When XHTML 2.0 will be published?
- Re: When XHTML 2.0 will be published?
- Re: separator/seperator
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator; Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- When XHTML 2.0 will be published?
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- RE: About XHTML 2.0
- RE: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- RE: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- RE: About XHTML 2.0
- RE: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator
- Re: separator/seperator
- Re: separator/seperator (was: Re: About XHTML 2.0)
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
Sunday, 22 May 2005
Saturday, 21 May 2005
Sunday, 22 May 2005
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: [xhtml2] Namespaces
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: [xhtml2] Namespaces
Saturday, 21 May 2005
- Re: Navigation Lists Lack Adequate Structure and Other Thoughts on Navigation Lists
- [xhtml2] Namespaces
- Re: Navigation Lists Lack Adequate Structure and Other Thoughts on Navigation Lists
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0
- Re: About XHTML 2.0