- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:30:43 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
On 7/7/05, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:22:12PM -0400, Orion Adrian wrote: > > > > I use block quotes because they contain paragraphs, or blocks of code > > > - i.e. becuase I'm quoting blocks - not due to their length. > > > If that's the case then wouldn't <codeblock> > > If I'm quoting code? No. Although it might be useful to have a block > element for holding code. Currently I use a <pre> with a <code> inside > it. Although I would probably still use an inline code element inside > that as sometimes I have several nested <code> (e.g. with classes > "xml", "tag", "attribute", "value", etc) since that provides an > elegent way to attach syntax highlighting in a stylesheet). > > > or <quoteblock> be more accurate? > > A block that is quoted, or a quoted block. Makes little different > really. I'd stick to blockquote to avoid needless (and confusing) > differences with HTML 4 element names. Since that would be such a minor point I would have to agree here. If we decide to stick with this, consistency much rule the day. -- Orion Adrian
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 22:30:45 UTC