Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> 
> Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > Any closing tag could be easily replaced with </> because it's clear 
> > in XHTML anyway which starting tag it should be matched with...
> 
> Oh, if only ...  I have never understood why this simple shorthand was 
> omitted from HTML.  I suppose it's too late for it to happen now ...

It has been in HTML since HTML2. It just has never been implemented 
(except by the validator).

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2005 13:39:09 UTC