Saturday, 30 July 2005
Tuesday, 26 July 2005
Monday, 25 July 2005
Saturday, 23 July 2005
- Re: Relaxed - new HTML validation service based on RELAX NG + Schematron
- Relaxed - new HTML validation service based on RELAX NG + Schematron
Thursday, 21 July 2005
- Re: XHTML Page Break Suggestion
- Re: XHTML Page Break Suggestion
- Re: XHTML Page Break Suggestion
- Re: XHTML Page Break Suggestion
- Re: XHTML Page Break Suggestion
Tuesday, 19 July 2005
- XHTML Page Break Suggestion
- Re: "style" question - Lists inside paragraphs
- Re: "style" question - Lists inside paragraphs
- "style" question - Lists inside paragraphs
- Header taglines (was: Attribute level for h element?)
- Re: [XHTML 2.0] Attribute level for h element?
- Re: [XHTML 2.0] Attribute level for h element?
- Re: [XHTML 2.0] Attribute level for h element?
- [XHTML 2.0] Attribute level for h element?
Monday, 18 July 2005
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- Fw: name attribute deprecated in XHTML
- Re: code and blockcode
Sunday, 17 July 2005
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- RE: PHP and HTML, and how to access PHP variables from HTML
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
Saturday, 16 July 2005
Friday, 15 July 2005
Saturday, 16 July 2005
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
Friday, 15 July 2005
Saturday, 16 July 2005
Friday, 15 July 2005
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- Re: code and blockcode
- Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
- Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed
- Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed
- RE: code and blockcode
Thursday, 14 July 2005
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- First public draft of the IPTC Common Components Library Specification
- Re: code and blockcode
Wednesday, 13 July 2005
- Re: separator abuse
- Re: name attribute deprecated in XHTML
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
Tuesday, 12 July 2005
Wednesday, 13 July 2005
Tuesday, 12 July 2005
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
Monday, 11 July 2005
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- Re: code and blockcode
- News Architecture presentation to W3C/IPTC meeting now available
- code and blockcode
Friday, 8 July 2005
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
Thursday, 7 July 2005
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- longcode and longquote instead of blockcode and blockquote
- Re: Best Practices: Presentational Images
- Re: Best Practices: Presentational Images
- Re: Best Practices: Presentational Images
- Re: Best Practices: Presentational Images
- Best Practices: Presentational Images
- Why the Class Attribute in External Style Sheets Isn't Preferred
- Re: Proposal: Allow Support for Multiple External Style Sheets with Limited Scope
- Re: Proposal: Allow Support for Multiple External Style Sheets with Limited Scope
- Proposal: Allow Support for Multiple External Style Sheets with Limited Scope
- First public draft of the News Metadata Framework Technical Specification
Wednesday, 6 July 2005
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- XHTML 2.0 with XHTML 1.0 namespace (again)
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
Tuesday, 5 July 2005
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- +1 Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model [semantic model] and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
Friday, 1 July 2005
Tuesday, 5 July 2005
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application
- Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application
- Re: Why don't td and th have display/value pairs?
Monday, 4 July 2005
- Re: Why don't td and th have display/value pairs?
- Why don't td and th have display/value pairs?
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
Saturday, 2 July 2005
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class
- Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class