Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute) from Trejkaz on 2005-01-21 (www-html@w3.org from January 2005)

From: Trejkaz <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:40:38 +1100
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <200501212140.46376.trejkaz@trypticon.org>

On Friday 21 January 2005 21:30, you wrote:
> Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
> > Why not just rel="nopagerank"?
>
> Why don't they use a processing instruction?

Or an attribute in a new and appropriate namespace... :-)

TX

-- 
             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
          Web site: http://xaoza.net/
         Jabber ID: trejkaz@jabber.zim.net.au
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73

Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 10:40:51 UTC