- From: Alexander Savenkov <savenkov@xmlhack.ru>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:15:06 +0300
- To: Denis Defreyne <amonre@amonre.org>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
On 2005-01-02T19:57:37+03:00 Denis Defreyne <amonre@amonre.org> wrote: ... > I can hear some people whisper the magic word "RSS". Indeed, marking > elements volatile in XHTML pages might not be very useful anymore when > there's an RSS feed. However, lots of sites don't have RSS feeds yet, > and some sites will never have one. Then, what makes you think these sites will someday have the markup you proposed? At http://www.activerefresh.com/ there's a program that allows you to monitor the pages without any feed by analyzing various parts of the code (that you choose). > What is more, some content is > difficult or even virtually impossible to serve using RSS. This is why > I believe that volatile elements in XHTML will be very useful. I agree with David Woolley: out of HTML scope. Alexander -- Alexander Savenkov http://www.xmlhack.ru/ savenkov@xmlhack.ru http://www.xmlhack.ru/authors/croll/
Received on Friday, 7 January 2005 16:40:21 UTC