- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:54:15 -0500
- To: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 22:36:30 UTC
Le 04 janv. 2005, à 13:34, Orion Adrian a écrit : >> fever, but because they don't care. Don't tell my dad he has to care >> about >> semantics when he wants to push online a page with the photos of his >> grand- > > Those classes are, in the case of HTML, semantic. CSS revolves around > the idea of styling semantic information, but is rarely used that way, > especially since most people could care about semantics as you say. Well classes are already an order of magnitude too much for many people. The fact is that for each elements and attributes of XHTML, there should (tempted to use MUST) be one or more use cases illustrating the benefits of the markup, but also showing the implementability of it. We are far from that in HTML for a long time. I would be also very surprised to see a XHTML requirement document based on the desires/needs of common users. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 22:36:30 UTC