- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:29:03 -0500
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Le 15 févr. 2005, à 11:52, Tantek Çelik a écrit : > A test *suite* would be sufficient but not necessary in this case. > All that > would be necessary is are the minimum tests to prove the above > statement > that " the element object is not implemented correctly on any > browser I have tried so far" along with a list of such browsers. A > proper > test suite for object is probably quite a bit more work. Ok. :) * Intrinsice size http://www.w3.org/QA/2004/02/object/test-case-001.html So we can expect that the image will be displayed with its intrinsic size unfortunately it's not. Specifically because of For example on - Safari 1.2.4 (v125.12) not displayed with intrinsic size - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Seems correct - Opera Version 7.51, Build 1797, Platform MacOS X Seems correct * Fallback mechanism. http://www.w3.org/QA/2004/02/object/test-case-005.html When the first object is not available, the fallback mechanism applies and the User agent must render the content of the object, which is in this case a text. - Safari 1.2.4 (v125.12) display a case with nothing except a file icon - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Display the text which is right (but as a bizarre behaviour with regards the CSS of the object which is still displayed but without respecting the size of the box.) - Opera Version 7.51, Build 1797, Platform MacOS X display a big box with the Error page of W3C -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:29:06 UTC