- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:06:59 +0100
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Quoting David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>: >> your liking. In HTML the DOM depends on the way your document is >> parsed which >> might give some unexpected results. (Although it will be defined, one day.) > > That's not true for valid HTML. Valid HTML always has a well defined DOM. > Missing opening and closing tags are still logically present in the document, > and their omission is just syntactic sugar. I guess that's mostly true. Besides that SGMLisms are obviously giving different results than you might expect from the validator I guess there are some other minor tidbits. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 23:07:09 UTC