- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:42:44 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
On 8/30/05, Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote: > Orion Adrian schreef: > >> Nevertheless, I think it's not so bad to retain the current set of > >> semantic elements. @role and @property allow for additional semantics > >> and could perhaps gradually phase out the semantic tags. > > > > I don't think @role is appropriate here for this. > [...] > > @role is more unique is that is singles off parts of the document. > > You are right. > > What about @property then, which makes something an RDF statement (*the* > language for semantics), if I understand correctly? Well there are two pieces to semantics, property and the other is the value (i.e. the idea/object that this links to). @property represents which property you're working with, but not the actual thing you're linking to. Would would have to have something else there. What syntax/grammar were you thinking about? -- Orion Adrian
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2005 13:43:20 UTC