- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:43:50 +0200
- To: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@tigerstaden.no>
- Cc: "HTML List" <www-html@w3.org>, Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com
* Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: >December 1st 2003, Christian Wolfgang Hujer made a proposition[1] to add >the <addr> and <blockaddr> elements to XHTML 2.0 to replace the existing ><address> element. I just wonder what the status on this proposal is, and >why the <address> element in XHTML 2.0 still is a bueprint copy of HTML 4. http://hades.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xhtml2-issues/Structural?id=7460 which has been rejected with the note "Superseded by PR#7474" and http://hades.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xhtml2-issues/Structural?id=7474 which has been rejected with the note BAE F2F:we have the structuring facility in XHTML, rather it is more efficient to use the meta data (example use property="") Original idea is described in PR#7460. For more discussion, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2003Dec/thread#3 Christian, did the HTML Working Group ever tell you that they rejected your suggestion?
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2004 18:44:41 UTC