- From: Tonico Strasser <contact_tonico@yahoo.de>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 13:43:31 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/em.html [...] > How much has <strong> been used, anyway? It's almost exclusively used by > structuralists, who may have each their own ideas of the semantics. What I > wrote is my understanding of the common position among the relatively few > people who have used <strong>. The whole new style Web design community (lots of people) is using <em> for italic and <strong> for bold because <b> and <i> are presentational. I was told that presentational markup is a bad thing ;-) For me, the semantic meaning of <em> an <strong> is not clear -- I would expect something like <dem> as well. > Basically, <em> and <strong> are _different in essence_, not just > different levels of emphasis. <strong> I agree. </strong> I welcome this proposal. Tonico
Received on Monday, 3 May 2004 07:27:45 UTC