- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 07:32:13 +0100
- To: trejkaz@trypticon.org
- CC: www-html@w3.org
trejkaz@trypticon.org wrote: > At Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:36:55AM -0000, Jim Ley wrote: > >> At Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:53:49PM +0000, Jim Ley wrote: >> >>>> Which browser contains a validating XML parser? >>> >>> Anything in the Mozilla family, at least. They will refuse to >>> even load invalid XML. >> >> The answer was actually IE (depending on what you mean by contains, >> it's only used if you load documents by scripting and specifically >> ask for validation). >> >> Mozilla does not have a validating XML parser see > > > Oh well. All I know is that the last few dozen invalid XML documents > I put through it didn't load. That's good enough for me, even though > some FAQ says it doesn't do it. There is a difference between valid, invalid, well-formed and ill-formed. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 06:32:31 UTC