- From: James Cerra <jfcst24_public@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:30:19 -0800 (PST)
- To: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>, Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTML WG List <www-html@w3.org>
Lisa, are you referring to http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-meta.html#s_metamodule If so, I was unaware of that module. Interesting - thanks for the head's up. The examples are a little confusing. It would be very benifical if the HTML WG would annote the examples with RDF equivalents (in either N3 or RDF/XML). Is there a particular transformation or interpretation as RDF/XML that the HTML WG had in mind? RDF isn't mentioned once on the page, yet the Metainformation Module seems to borrow a lot of SW concepts from Resources Typed Literals. Also, the way they intend people to use the Metainformation Attribute Modules seems confusing. Got any pointer? :-) -- Jimmy C. PS. Nemo should now be retrieved from http://nemo.dev.java.net CC. The HTML Working Group so I get their feedback. At the RDF Interest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com> wrote: > FYI > if you are planning to since I plan on embedding RDF > data directly into > documents. There is a draft for XHTML 2.0 for > embedding RDF into the body of > the document using the Link element. > > They are thinking of some other mechanisms too, but > I think Link was the > most powerful proposal. > > > Keep well > Lisa __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 20:30:51 UTC