- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:38:00 -0400
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E2690F8E-E623-11D8-91B3-000A95718F82@w3.org>
Interesting analysis Björn Le 03 août 2004, à 15:26, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > if the latter is > what the HTML Working Group considers more important, it would make way > more sense to require that style sheets are not used to insert the > quote > marks, or to require user agents to support the relevant CSS 2.0 > features. CSS 2.0 or CSS 2.1? CSS 2.1 is in CR phase http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/ You can read their s/Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria/Proposed Recommendation Entrance Criteria/ http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/#crec which means to enter the Proposed Recommendation status: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfr """ 2. Shown that each feature of the technical report has been implemented. Preferably, the Working Group SHOULD be able to demonstrate two interoperable implementations of each feature. If the Director believes that immediate Advisory Committee review is critical to the success of a technical report, the Director MAY accept to Call for Review of a Proposed Recommendation even without adequate implementation experience;""" More information about Implementation Report http://esw.w3.org/topic/ImplementationReport We might hope that it will be implemented (or dropped :/) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 10:38:46 UTC