- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 10:32:42 +0200 (MEST)
- To: "Matthew Fletcher" <fletcherm@business1st.uk.com>, www-html@w3.org
If you don't question the sense of two or more definitions (and I mean
_definitions_) for one term, I propose an extended usage of the old definition
list like
<dl>
<dt>foo</dt>
<dd>bar 1</dd>
<dd>bar 2</dd>
<dt>mickey</dt>
<dd>mouse</dd>
</dl>
Regards,
Jens Meiert.
>
>
>
> Marcos Caceres said:
> > When I think about it some more, doing this kind of nesting may also
> > require
> > the renaming of the dl, dd, dt, or even adding some sort of container
> > that
> > wraps around a definition.. Something different like this:
> >
> >
> >
> > <dl>
> >
> > <definition>
> >
> > <dt>My term</dt>
> >
> > <dd>This is the a definition</dd>
> >
> > <dd>This is the another definition</dd>
> >
> > </definition>
> >
> > </dl>
>
> This sounds a lot better to me
>
--
Jens Meiert
Steubenstr. 28
D-26123 Oldenburg
Telefon +49 (0)441 99 86 147
Telefax +49 (0)89 1488 2325 91
Mobil +49 (0)175 78 4146 5
eMail <jens@meiert.com>
Internet <http://meiert.com>
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2003 04:32:50 UTC