- From: John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:04:54 -0500
- To: www-html@w3.org
Henri wrote on Friday, May 16, 2003 at 9:41:05 AM: > Not supporting character entities in XHTML is not a bug in Opera if > 1) XHTML is an application of XML > and > 2) XHTML user agents aren't required to use validating XML > processors. Actually, Opera Software internally decides what's a bug in Opera and what's not. Whether or not they technically need to do something is irrelevant; although I'm sure it's a consideration, there are practical concerns as well. > Do you classify TextEdit (bundled with Mac OS X) and WordPad > (bundled with Windows XP) as "special advanced authoring tools"? I've never used TextEdit. I'd hesitate to even call WordPad an authoring tool, but perhaps the Windows XP version is different. People make use of named entities daily, and you've not provided any evidence that they're harmful; all you've proven is that the named entities are redundant, which is obvious by their nature and stated purpose. You haven't made a case for outright removal. The original poster suggested they be made optional, which is something I'm okay with since market forces will compel the major UAs to support them anyway. As a practical matter, the major UAs already support HTML, which means they support the named entities already, which means there's little reason to not support them for XHTML (unless they're removed). -- John Lewis
Received on Friday, 16 May 2003 13:09:39 UTC