- From: Robin Lionheart <w3c-ml@robinlionheart.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 04:20:08 -0400
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
John Lewis wrote: > If you want the equivalent of strong emphasis to be a third level of > emphasis, which may be closer to strong's original meaning > (considering most people see "strong" and think "bold"), the > equivalent is still accomplished through a style sheet: > > em{font-style:italic} > em em{font-style:normal} > em em em{font-weight:bold} So in a document using these three levels of emphasis, one might write: The B element is <em>deprecated</em> so you <em><em><em>must</em></em></em> replace it with multiple EMs. Isn't there some way to use level 1 and level 3 emphasis in concert without a tag explosion? If the degree of emphasis is not purely presentational, perhaps this should be an attribute of the <em> tag. In other words, perhaps what <strong> means is <em degree="strong">. If a negative degree were provided (<em degree="light">?), then XHTML could gain the capacity to de-emphasize text. Possible presentations of deemphasized text might be thinner fonts, lighter colored text, smaller point sizes (replacing some uses of the deprecated <small>), or in audio media, reduced volume.
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 04:17:40 UTC