Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0

• From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
• Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:56:41 +0200
• To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
• CC: www-html@w3.org
• Message-ID: <3EC0EB89.5060105@netscape.com>

Mimasa,

First, be sure there is nothing personal in my original post. I know how 
burried under tons and tons of work you are.

Second, if XHTML 2.0 is made a little bit for the Web (yeah, I mean for 
browsing), what matters is DTD and Schema, not RELAX NG. Sorry but I 
don't see browsers implement that any time soon. In that sense, I still 
think that the focus should be given to DTD and Schema, not RELAX NG.

Third, knowing as soon as possible if the modularization of XHTML 2.0 
can or cannot be described by a DTD seems to me of *critical importance* 
for browser vendors. Again, browsers use DTD or Schemas, not RELAX NG.

Regards,

</Daniel>

Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 08:55:59 UTC