- From: Philip TAYLOR [PC87S/O-XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:58:49 +0100
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- CC: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
David Woolley wrote: > > > Authors make use of target without frames all the time. Target can be used > > with frames but neither is dependent on the other. > > Generally they use them for popups, which is a presentational/behavioural > feature, having many of the undesirable features of frames and being > heavily abused (but probably by the scripting route) to force advertising > on users of pages on free hosting services. Their use is discouraged > by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, because they cause > unexpected changes in focus. I can't agree that target is "generally" used for popups. Yes, popups almost always use target, but there are many valid reasons why one might want to start a new window which should not be overlooked. The WCAG guidelines may well deprecate the use of target, but so many other activities can cause a change of focus that singling out the use of target seems to me to be way o.t.t. I /hate/ it when I'm busy typing away, and some asynchronous task changes focus (sometimes causing my keystrokes to be interpreted in totally unexpected ways, leading to accidental deletion of e-mails and so forth) but clicking on a link is /not/ asynchronous, and if focus changes as a result, it is not unreasonable (IMHO). Philip Taylor, RHBNC
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 06:59:52 UTC