Saturday, 31 May 2003
- Re: Adding label to other list elements?
- Re: XHTML 2 WD: Embedding Attribute Collection Comments
- Re: XHTML 2 0WD: Embedding Attribute Collection Comments
- Adding label to other list elements?
- XHTML 2.0 List Module negates the semantic usefulness of definition lists.
Friday, 30 May 2003
- Re: h and section/div
- Re: Do small chunks of text belong into a paragraph
- Do small chunks of text belong into a paragraph
- Re: h and section/div
- Recommendations
- Re: XHTML 2 WD: Embedding Attribute Collection Comments
Thursday, 29 May 2003
- Re: XHTML 2 WD: Embedding Attribute Collection Comments
- Re: h and section/div
- h and section/div
- Re: XHTML 2 WD: Embedding Attribute Collection Comments
- XHTML 2 WD: Embedding Attribute Collection Comments
Tuesday, 27 May 2003
Thursday, 22 May 2003
Tuesday, 27 May 2003
Monday, 26 May 2003
Sunday, 18 May 2003
Monday, 26 May 2003
- Conformance vs. validity (was Re: XHTML module for addresses)
- Re: Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
Saturday, 24 May 2003
- Re: Named character entities
- Re: Named character entities
- RE: Re: Yet seriously folks (was: italics)
- RE: Re: Yet seriously folks (was: italics)
Thursday, 22 May 2003
Saturday, 24 May 2003
Friday, 23 May 2003
- div's help
- Re: Yet seriously folks (was: italics)
- navigation list
- Re: Yet seriously folks (was: italics)
- Re: Yet seriously folks (was: italics)
- Re: Yet seriously folks (was: italics)
Thursday, 22 May 2003
Friday, 23 May 2003
Thursday, 22 May 2003
- cite, blockquote, quote
- Re: Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
- Re: Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: Yet seriously folks (was: italics)
- Yet seriously folks (was: italics)
- <sentence> silliness (Was: Re: italics)
- Re: <hr> tag
- Re: italics
- Re: italics
- [Fwd: Re: italics]
Wednesday, 21 May 2003
Thursday, 22 May 2003
- RE: xhtml 2.0 working draft feedback
- Re: italics
- Re: xhtml 2.0 working draft feedback
- Re: (Image)Maps in XHTML 2
- Re: (Image)Maps in XHTML 2
- Re: xhtml 2.0 working draft feedback
Wednesday, 21 May 2003
Wednesday, 14 May 2003
Wednesday, 21 May 2003
- (Image)Maps in XHTML 2
- Re: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- Re: [XHTML2] Comments on WD 5
- [XHTML2] Comments on WD 5
- Re: object code=
- Re: object code=
- Re: input type= file problems
- Re: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- Re: object code=
Tuesday, 20 May 2003
Wednesday, 21 May 2003
Tuesday, 20 May 2003
- Re: object code=
- Re: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- Re: object code=
- RE: object code=
- RE: object code=
- object code=
- RE: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
Wednesday, 21 May 2003
Tuesday, 20 May 2003
- RE: Abuse - corcorsm - Obscenity (KMM69255848V15162L0KM)
- RE: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- Re: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- RE: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- RE: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- RE: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- RE: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- Re: dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
- dl, dd, dt in XHTML 2.0
Monday, 19 May 2003
- Re: make this your homepage
- Re: Named character entities
- Re: XHTML2 and metainformation
- Re: cite attribute's limitations (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: Named character entities
- Re: Named character entities
Sunday, 18 May 2003
- Re: Named character entities
- Character entities (was: Re: XHTML2 MIME type)
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: Named character entities
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 and metainformation
- Re: cite attribute's limitations (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: XHTML2 and metainformation
- Re: Some thoughts on an extensible hypertext markup language
Saturday, 17 May 2003
Friday, 16 May 2003
Saturday, 17 May 2003
Friday, 16 May 2003
- Re: Some thoughts on an extensible hypertext markup language
- RE: XHTML module for addresses
- rel And rev Link-Types
- Re: Element for Dates/Times
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: Named character entities (was: XHTML2 MIME type)
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
- Re: Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
- RE: [www.washtimes.com] Saddam's Trail Leads to Paris
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: Element for Dates/Times
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
Thursday, 15 May 2003
Friday, 16 May 2003
Thursday, 15 May 2003
Friday, 16 May 2003
- Re: XHTML2 and metainformation
- Re: <em><em><em>, degree of emphasis attribute?
- RE: Columbia Prof.'s Remarks Spark Threats
Thursday, 15 May 2003
- Re: <em><em><em>, degree of emphasis attribute?
- Re: <em><em><em>, degree of emphasis attribute?
- Re: <em><em><em>, degree of emphasis attribute?
- Re: XHTML2 and metainformation
- Re: Magic Elements (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 and metainformation
- Re: Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
- Re: Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
- Semantic versus Structure for XHTML 2.0
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: <q> vs. <quote>, naming etc.
- Re: Element for Dates/Times
- Re: XHTML2 and metainformation
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: XHTML module for addresses
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- XHTML module for addresses
- <em><em><em>, degree of emphasis attribute?
- XHTML 2.0 suggestion: add HTML 3.0's <credit> for <blockquote>s
- Columbia Prof.'s Remarks Spark Threats
- Character entities in XHTML2 (was Re: XHTML2 MIME type)
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
Wednesday, 14 May 2003
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- Forwarded Article: March 2003
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
Tuesday, 13 May 2003
- Turismo Rural - promoções fantásticas / promociones fantásticos
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Annotations
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: <blocksamp> and <blockkbd>
- Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- Re: The style attribute, again
- <HP> and HTML history
- Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0
- RE: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: Some thoughts on an extensible hypertext markup language
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: <blocksamp> and <blockkbd>
- Re: XHTML 2.0 suggestion: <caption> for <object>, <attribution> for <blockquote>
- Re: <blocksamp> and <blockkbd> (was Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: <blocksamp> and <blockkbd> (was Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: <blocksamp> and <blockkbd> (was Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: The style attribute, again
Monday, 12 May 2003
- Re: XHTML 2.0 suggestion: <caption> for <object>, <attribution> for <blockquote>
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: XHTML 2.0 suggestion: <caption> for <object>, <attribution> for <blockquote>
- <blocksamp> and <blockkbd> (was Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: The style attribute, again (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 suggestion: <caption> for <object>, <attribution> for <blockquote>
- RE: The style attribute, again
- Re: The style attribute, again
- RE: Some thoughts on an extensible hypertext markup language
- RE: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: Some thoughts on an extensible hypertext markup language
- RE: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Some thoughts on an extensible hypertext markup language
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- em and strong (Was: Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- FW: The style attribute, again
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- RE: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft - a correction
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
Friday, 9 May 2003
Monday, 12 May 2003
- Re: The style attribute, again
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: Nested ems vs. strong (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: The style attribute, again (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: Nested ems vs. strong (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: XHTML 2.0 to contain long element names
- Re: XHTML 2.0 to contain long element names
- Re: XHTML 2.0 suggestion: <caption> for <object>, <attribution> for <blockquote>
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: XHTML 2.0 to contain long element names
- A proposed additional attribute for the <dfn> element
- Re: XHTML 2.0 to contain long element names
- Re: XHTML 2.0 to contain long element names
Sunday, 11 May 2003
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- XHTML 2.0 to contain long element names
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- XHTML 2, Creation of a New Language
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- RE: XHTML2 MIME type
- RE: Magic Elements (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: <strong> is not equivalent to <em> <em>
- Re: Magic Elements (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- 'target' attr (was Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Re: Magic Elements (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
Saturday, 10 May 2003
- Re: Magic Elements (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- Magic Elements (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)
- RE: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- RE: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: <strong> is not equivalent to <em> <em>
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: XHTML2 MIME type
- Re: <strong> is not equivalent to <em> <em>
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: <strong> is not equivalent to <em> <em>
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: <strong> is not equivalent to <em> <em>
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- XHTML 2.0 suggestion: <caption> for <object>, <attribution> for <blockquote>
Friday, 9 May 2003
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- comments about XHTML 2 Style Attr Module
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
- Re: [XHTML2WD5] Ilegal CSS Example
- kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft
Thursday, 8 May 2003
- [XHTML2WD5] Ilegal CSS Example
- Contradiction wrt Defaulting Characters Sets (HTML 4.01)
- Re: xhtml
- Re: xhtml
- Re: xhtml
- xhtml
- Re: Updated XHTML 2.0 draft published
- Re: Updated XHTML 2.0 draft published - 'style' attr
Wednesday, 7 May 2003
- Re: Updated XHTML 2.0 draft published
- Updated XHTML 2.0 draft published
- Re: PLEASE BOYCOTT ALL US PRODUCTS TOO
- Re: PLEASE BOYCOTT ALL US PRODUCTS TOO
- PLEASE BOYCOTT ALL US PRODUCTS TOO
Tuesday, 6 May 2003
Monday, 5 May 2003
- RE: PLEASE BOYCOTT ALL FRENCH PRODUCTS!
- RE: PLEASE BOYCOTT ALL FRENCH PRODUCTS!
- PLEASE BOYCOTT ALL FRENCH PRODUCTS!
- Re: Netscape browse image does not work.
- Netscape browse image does not work.
Thursday, 1 May 2003
Monday, 5 May 2003
- Re: Proposed Additions/Modifications to XHTML 2 Edit Collection
- Re: Giving alternate text semantical meaning
- Re: Proposed Additions/Modifications to XHTML 2 Edit Collection
Sunday, 4 May 2003
- Re: Giving alternate text semantical meaning
- Giving alternate text semantical meaning
- Re: Proposed Additions/Modifications to XHTML 2 Edit Collection
- Re: Proposed Additions/Modifications to XHTML 2 Edit Collection
- Proposed Additions/Modifications to XHTML 2 Edit Collection
- Proposed Additions/Modifications to XHTML 2 Edit Collection