RE: WD-xhtml2-20030506: <qst>ions and <ans>wers

I'm inclined to agree with Jens Meiert.  This sort of question/answer
structure does not seem to have any great benefit (at least, no one has
bothered to point them out yet).

Regards,
Peter Foti


>-----Original Message-----
>From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf
>Of Jens Meiert
>Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:46 AM
>To: www-html@w3.org; www-html-editor@w3.org
>Subject: Re: WD-xhtml2-20030506: <qst>ions and <ans>wers
>
>
>
>>      <section class="qa">
>>          <qst>It's been a decade since 242 released any new material.
>>              What does it feel like writing and recording new
>>              songs?</qst>
>>          <ans>We haven't stopped writing new material and we kept on
>>              experimenting new fields in sound research.  
>The difference
>>              is that we have decided to finalise a product; 
>so we need to
>>              consider how to translate those works into acceptable
>>              formats: songs, instrumental tracks, etc.  Music where
>>              people can find a reference.</ans>
>>      </section>
>
>(I'd implement them as block-level elements)
>
>In general, it seems like the sentence, word, and letter 
>element discussion
>(useless). I won't feel comfortable when you integrate those 
>elements in the
>specification, so I don't agree.
>
>
> Jens Meiert.
>
>
>-- 
>Jens Meiert
>
>Steubenstr. 28
>D-26123 Oldenburg
>
>Mobil +49 (0)175 78 4146 5
>Telefon +49 (0)441 99 86 147
>Telefax +49 (0)89 1488 2325 91
>
>Mail <jens@meiert.com>
>Internet <http://meiert.com>
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:06:48 UTC