- From: Ben Meadowcroft <cee.plus@virgin.net>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 16:53:24 +0100
- To: "Brant Langer Gurganus" <brantgurganus2001@cherokeescouting.org>, "Toby A Inkster" <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Brant Langer Gurganus wrote: > Toby A Inkster wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 12:03:20AM -0500, Brant Langer Gurganus >> wrote: >>> That is the case with the informatively defined and often given >>> example: <blockcode> >>> <link href="mailto:webmaster@domain.com" rev="made"> >>> </blockcode> >>> >>> In that example, the webmaster@domain.com made the page, not the >>> other way around. >> >> No, you have things the wrong way around. Your example says "this >> e-mail address was made by this page", which usually will not make >> sense, >> unless its a page generated by the final stage of a webmail signup >> script. :-) >> >> > In that case, is the correct usage for telling who made a site: > <blockcode> > <link href="mailto:webmaster@domain.com" rel="made"> > </blockcode> "made" is an unspecified link type. As such there is no correct usage for telling who made a site using link elements specified in the HTML 4.01 that I can see. If you want to use link types specified elsewhere then you should use a profile attribute to indicate this. The following URL may give you some pointers http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/dcq-html/ -- BenM http://www.benmeadowcroft.com/
Received on Saturday, 5 July 2003 11:56:46 UTC