- From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:27:02 +0900 (JST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > The HTML WG Roadmap <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/xhtml-roadmap/> states > that you expect XHTML 2.0 to go into Last Call in October 2003 and > advance the specification to Candidate Recommendation in January 2004. > Is this information up to date? It's the WG's current "hope". It may change over time. The WG won't issue a Last Call until they feel it's done. The plan has been delayed to address large number of comments the WG has received so far. > Will there be any other Working Draft > before your Last Call Announcement? You may expect one or more Working Drafts before Last Call. It won't be so long before the next draft is published. > How much time do you expect to give > for the Last Call review period? It depends on negotiation with other Working Groups. It won't be too short. > I like to suggest that XHTML 2.0 is not advanced to Candidate > Recommendation status after Last Call but rather that the HTML WG issues > a second Last Call after reviewer comments have been addressed. That will happen when substantial changes are made. > A number of specifications already went > this path (though not necessarily intentionally) and I believe these > specifications, their communities and the Working Groups benefitted from > this slightly informal process. We know it as the Process Issue #168. The resolution is that a WG MAY publish a WD with minor changes after last call, then advance to the next phase. Regards, -- Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2003 05:27:05 UTC