Re: XHTML 2.0 Last Call process

* J. King wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 06:11:39 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> 
>wrote:
>
>> I like to suggest that XHTML 2.0 is not advanced to Candidate
>> Recommendation status after Last Call but rather that the HTML WG issues
>> a second Last Call after reviewer comments have been addressed.
>
>Last means last.

http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#return-to-wg

Received on Sunday, 3 August 2003 03:45:37 UTC